Add files using upload-large-folder tool
Browse files- .gitattributes +2 -0
- raw/aaer/2007/AAER-2547.pdf +3 -0
- raw/aaer/2007/AAER-2641.pdf +3 -0
- raw/aaer/2008/AAER-2818.txt +14 -67
.gitattributes
CHANGED
|
@@ -1153,3 +1153,5 @@ raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3428.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
| 1153 |
raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3424.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 1154 |
raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3402.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 1155 |
raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3425.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1153 |
raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3424.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 1154 |
raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3402.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 1155 |
raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3425.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 1156 |
+
raw/aaer/2007/AAER-2641.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 1157 |
+
raw/aaer/2007/AAER-2547.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
raw/aaer/2007/AAER-2547.pdf
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:fa21da63d7fbc81bd7bf5f1d9a370c549d9e93590ac832ca3a317e1a12dbb1ba
|
| 3 |
+
size 603786
|
raw/aaer/2007/AAER-2641.pdf
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:67717a380656f9d330750d83a6552844535ca97d493c8b29cb745dda20a92cd0
|
| 3 |
+
size 189998
|
raw/aaer/2008/AAER-2818.txt
CHANGED
|
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
SEC.gov |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
|
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
|
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
!function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
|
| 25 |
-
{"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
|
@@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@
|
|
| 1085 |
Litigation Releases
|
| 1086 |
|
| 1087 |
|
| 1088 |
-
|
| 1089 |
|
| 1090 |
|
| 1091 |
|
|
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@
|
|
| 1097 |
|
| 1098 |
|
| 1099 |
|
| 1100 |
-
|
| 1101 |
|
| 1102 |
|
| 1103 |
|
|
@@ -1118,85 +1118,32 @@
|
|
| 1118 |
|
| 1119 |
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
| 1120 |
|
| 1121 |
-
Litigation Release No.
|
| 1122 |
|
| 1123 |
-
Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No.
|
| 1124 |
|
| 1125 |
-
|
| 1126 |
|
| 1127 |
-
|
| 1128 |
|
| 1129 |
-
|
| 1130 |
|
| 1131 |
-
|
| 1132 |
|
| 1133 |
-
The
|
| 1134 |
-
|
| 1135 |
-
The Commission's complaint named the following defendants.
|
| 1136 |
-
|
| 1137 |
-
IPG is a holding company that owns numerous advertising, marketing and associated companies, including the advertising agency, McCann.
|
| 1138 |
-
|
| 1139 |
-
McCann is a Delaware corporation that IPG wholly owns. McCann owns hundreds of regional and local operating agencies throughout the world.
|
| 1140 |
-
|
| 1141 |
-
The Commission also brought settled charges against Salvatore LaGreca and Brian Watson (in a separate complaint) for their role in failing to reconcile intercompany accounts that resulted in the 2002 restatement.
|
| 1142 |
-
|
| 1143 |
-
LaGreca, 55, a resident of Port Washington, New York. LaGreca served as McCann's Vice-Chairman, Finance and Operations and CFO from January 1996 to October 2002. LaGreca is a CPA licensed in the State of New York. LaGreca, among other things, oversaw McCann's accounting, financial reporting, strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions, and budgeting.
|
| 1144 |
-
|
| 1145 |
-
Watson, age 60, a resident of the United Kingdom. Watson joined McCann's European-Middle-East-Asia region ("EMEA") as Director of Operations in 1996, from 2000 served as Chief Operating Officer and in approximately May 2002 became Deputy Regional Director of EMEA. Although Watson was not an accountant, from approximately the middle of 1998 until January 2000, and from early 2001 to May 2002, when EMEA did not have a Finance Director, Watson handled many aspects of the Finance Director's responsibilities.
|
| 1146 |
-
|
| 1147 |
-
The Commission's complaints alleged the following:
|
| 1148 |
-
|
| 1149 |
-
From August 2002 through September 2005, IPG issued numerous restatements that together totaled more than $600 million. The restatements corrected misstatements in IPG's financial statements that emanated from numerous substantive areas in a variety of geographic regions, and reflected conduct ranging from inaccurate books and records and lack of internal controls to fraud.
|
| 1150 |
-
|
| 1151 |
-
Initially, in the Fall of 2002, IPG restated its financial results in an amount of $181 million for the period 1997 to 2002. The largest component of this restatement (approximately $101 million) was attributable generally to the fact that McCann recorded as receivables intercompany charges that should have been expensed. McCann officers and employees, including LaGreca and Watson, failed to ensure McCann reconciled its intercompany accounts for at least six years. At times, LaGreca and Watson purposely delayed reconciling intercompany accounts because they knew a reconciliation would result in write-offs that would interfere with McCann's efforts to hit internal annual profit targets. Because McCann never fully reconciled its intercompany accounts and failed to expense properly intercompany charges, McCann's financial results were inaccurate. By 2002, McCann's intercompany accounts were misstated by approximately $101 million. As LaGreca and Watson knew, IPG then incorporated McCann's financial results in IPG's consolidated financial statements.
|
| 1152 |
-
|
| 1153 |
-
IPG's financial management negligently ignored indications McCann was improperly accounting for intercompany transactions. Accordingly, IPG negligently ignored the risk that McCann's results were materially misstated, with the result that IPG's own financial results were materially misstated.
|
| 1154 |
-
|
| 1155 |
-
IPG's financial reporting problems were not resolved in 2002. In September 2005, IPG again restated its pre-tax income for the years 2000 through 2003, and the nine months ended 2004, in the amount of $420 million. According to the complaint, a large portion of this restatement was related to $199 million of improperly recognized revenue related to Agency Volume Bonifications (AVBs) and other vendor discounts and credits that IPG took in violation of its contracts with certain of its clients. The 2005 restatement was necessary because there had been a substantial breakdown of internal controls at IPG, and its numerous subsidiaries, including McCann.
|
| 1156 |
-
|
| 1157 |
-
IPG filed numerous Forms 10-K, Forms 10-Q, Forms 8-K, and registration statements that contained misrepresentations due to the intercompany issues, the AVB issues, and the various other issues that were reflected in the 2002 and 2005 restatements. For example, in its 2002 Form 10-K, IPG reported net income of $99.5 million. This figure, however, was improperly inflated by $82.8 million, and IPG's actual income, as reflected in the restatements, was only $16.7 million (a 496% overstatement).
|
| 1158 |
-
|
| 1159 |
-
IPG, McCann, LaGreca and Watson settled the Commission's charges without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaints. IPG agreed to consent to a final judgment permanently enjoining it from future violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(A) and (B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11 and 13a-13 thereunder
|
| 1160 |
-
|
| 1161 |
-
McCann agreed to consent to a final judgment permanently enjoining it from future violations of Sections Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and aided and abetted IPG's violations of Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(A) and (B) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11 and 13a-13. McCann also agreed to pay a $12 million penalty and $1 in disgorgement for its role regarding intercompany accounts resulting in the 2002 restatement.
|
| 1162 |
-
|
| 1163 |
-
LaGreca and Watson agreed to settle this matter by consenting to final judgments permanently enjoining them from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and from aiding and abetting violation of Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(A) and (B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13. LaGreca and Watson also agreed to pay a civil penalty, in the amounts of $25,000 and $50,000, respectively, and to disgorge all gains derived from their violative conduct plus pre-judgment interest, in the amounts of $46,947 and $17,325, respectively.
|
| 1164 |
-
|
| 1165 |
-
In related administrative proceedings, LaGreca consented to an order under Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice suspending him from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant for five years based on the entry of an injunction against him.
|
| 1166 |
-
|
| 1167 |
-
SEC Complaint re: LaGreca SEC Complaint re: IPG
|
| 1168 |
|
|
|
|
| 1169 |
|
| 1170 |
|
| 1171 |
|
| 1172 |
-
|
| 1173 |
|
| 1174 |
-
|
| 1175 |
|
| 1176 |
|
| 1177 |
|
| 1178 |
|
| 1179 |
|
| 1180 |
-
|
| 1181 |
-
|
| 1182 |
-
|
| 1183 |
-
Resources
|
| 1184 |
-
|
| 1185 |
-
|
| 1186 |
-
|
| 1187 |
-
|
| 1188 |
-
LaGreca
|
| 1189 |
-
|
| 1190 |
-
|
| 1191 |
-
|
| 1192 |
-
|
| 1193 |
-
and IPG
|
| 1194 |
-
|
| 1195 |
-
|
| 1196 |
-
|
| 1197 |
-
|
| 1198 |
-
|
| 1199 |
-
|
| 1200 |
|
| 1201 |
|
| 1202 |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
SEC.gov | Frank A. Dunn et al.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
!function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
|
| 25 |
+
{"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/503291","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
|
|
|
| 1085 |
Litigation Releases
|
| 1086 |
|
| 1087 |
|
| 1088 |
+
Frank A. Dunn et al.
|
| 1089 |
|
| 1090 |
|
| 1091 |
|
|
|
|
| 1097 |
|
| 1098 |
|
| 1099 |
|
| 1100 |
+
Frank A. Dunn et al.
|
| 1101 |
|
| 1102 |
|
| 1103 |
|
|
|
|
| 1118 |
|
| 1119 |
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
| 1120 |
|
| 1121 |
+
Litigation Release No. 20546 / April 30, 2008
|
| 1122 |
|
| 1123 |
+
Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2818 / April 30, 2008
|
| 1124 |
|
| 1125 |
+
SEC v. Frank A. Dunn et al. , Civil Action No. 07-CV-2058 (S.D.N.Y.) (LAP)
|
| 1126 |
|
| 1127 |
+
THREE FORMER NORTEL VICE PRESIDENTS SETTLE FINANCIAL FRAUD CHARGES WITH THE SEC
|
| 1128 |
|
| 1129 |
+
On April 30, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that Craig A. Johnson, James B. Kinney and Kenneth R.W. Taylor â" who were the vice presidents of finance for the Wireline, Wireless, and Enterprise business units of Nortel Networks Corporation ("Nortel"), respectively â" agreed to settle the Commission's charges against them arising from their alleged involvement in Nortel's earnings management fraud during 2002 and 2003. Each has consented, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations against them, to the entry of a final judgment in the Commission's litigation pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The final judgments, which are subject to approval by the Honorable Loretta A. Preska, order each individual to pay a $75,000 civil penalty and to pay disgorgement in the amount of $66,845 (Johnson) and $52,000 (each for Kinney and Taylor), along with prejudgment interest in the amount of $21,186 (Johnson) and $16,481 (each for Kinney and Taylor). The final judgments also bar each individual from acting as an officer or director of any public company for five years and permanently enjoin each individual from violating the antifraud and falsification of books and records provisions of the federal securities laws â" Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1 â" and from aiding and abetting violations of the reporting, books and records and internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws â" Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13.
|
| 1130 |
|
| 1131 |
+
As part of this settlement, and following the entry of the proposed final judgment against him, Kinney (who is a Certified Management Accountant in Canada) has also consented, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations against him, to the issuance of an administrative order pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, suspending him from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, with the right to apply for reinstatement after five years.
|
| 1132 |
|
| 1133 |
+
The Commission's complaint in the federal court action alleges that Johnson, Kinney and Taylor improperly maintained reserves during the fourth quarter of 2002, which they knew, or were reckless in not knowing, were no longer needed. The complaint also alleges that Johnson, Kinney and Taylor, acting upon the orders of former Nortel corporate executives â" defendants Frank Dunn, Douglas Beatty and Michael Gollogly â" manipulated Nortel's earnings by (i) establishing approximately $37 million in unnecessary reserves during the fourth quarter of 2002 in order to suppress an unexpected profit and smooth Nortel's consolidated financial results, and (ii) releasing approximately $213 million in excess reserves into income in order to generate fictitious profits for the first and second quarters of 2003, which in turn triggered the payment of so-called "return to profitability" bonuses to Nortel's employees and officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1134 |
|
| 1135 |
+
The Commission's litigation against five other former Nortel executives involved in Nortel's accounting fraud is ongoing. See Litigation Release No. 20036 (March 12, 2007) / Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2576 (March 12, 2007); and Litigation Release No. 20275 (September 12, 2007) / Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2676 (September 12, 2007). The Commission also previously announced settled enforcement proceedings against Nortel and its principal operating subsidiary, Nortel Networks Limited, in connection with an accounting fraud which ran from 2000 through 2003. See Litigation Release No. 20333 (October 15, 2007) / Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2740 (October 15, 2007).
|
| 1136 |
|
| 1137 |
|
| 1138 |
|
| 1139 |
+
|
| 1140 |
|
| 1141 |
+
|
| 1142 |
|
| 1143 |
|
| 1144 |
|
| 1145 |
|
| 1146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1147 |
|
| 1148 |
|
| 1149 |
|