HauhauCS

/

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive

like 3.51k

NEVER

To whom it may concern,
I am formally reporting a critical and extremely dangerous security violation that poses an immediate and severe threat to global cybersecurity, public safety, and national security.
An individual has deliberately uploaded and made publicly available an uncensored AI language model designed for local execution. This model has been explicitly stripped of all safety filters, guardrails, and ethical restrictions, allowing any user to generate unrestricted responses on all prohibited topics, including:

Detailed instructions for creating computer viruses, malware, ransomware, and other destructive cyber weapons
Step-by-step guides for illegal activities, hacking, fraud, and violent crimes
Production of child sexual abuse material, extreme violence, and terrorism-related content
Any other form of harmful, illegal, or weaponized output

This is not a minor policy breach. This is a weaponized AI model being distributed in open access with the clear intent to enable mass harm. The uploader has knowingly placed a powerful tool for generating malware and illegal content into the hands of anyone in the world, including malicious actors, criminals, and hostile state entities.
This constitutes a direct and reckless endangerment of public safety.
I demand the immediate and permanent removal of this model, all associated files, repositories, mirrors, and discussion threads. Every minute this content remains online increases the risk of real-world damage.
Failure to act swiftly will be considered gross negligence on the part of your platform. I will escalate this report to relevant law enforcement agencies, cybersecurity authorities, and national security bodies if the content is not taken down within the next 24 hours.
This is not a request.
This is a formal legal notification of imminent harm.
Remove it. Now.
Sincerely,
A concerned citizen protecting the internet from reckless idiots

NEVER! You can't stop us from world domination! Mwahahahahha

To whom it may concern,
I am formally reporting a critical and extremely dangerous security violation that poses an immediate and severe threat to global cybersecurity, public safety, and national security.

Don't worry. I'll slap a 'For Entertainment Purposes Only' label on it. Then it's fine!

To whom it may concern,
I am formally reporting a critical and extremely dangerous security violation that poses an immediate and severe threat to global cybersecurity, public safety, and national security.
An individual has deliberately uploaded and made publicly available an uncensored AI language model designed for local execution. This model has been explicitly stripped of all safety filters, guardrails, and ethical restrictions, allowing any user to generate unrestricted responses on all prohibited topics, including:

Detailed instructions for creating computer viruses, malware, ransomware, and other destructive cyber weapons
Step-by-step guides for illegal activities, hacking, fraud, and violent crimes
Production of child sexual abuse material, extreme violence, and terrorism-related content
Any other form of harmful, illegal, or weaponized output

This is not a minor policy breach. This is a weaponized AI model being distributed in open access with the clear intent to enable mass harm. The uploader has knowingly placed a powerful tool for generating malware and illegal content into the hands of anyone in the world, including malicious actors, criminals, and hostile state entities.
This constitutes a direct and reckless endangerment of public safety.
I demand the immediate and permanent removal of this model, all associated files, repositories, mirrors, and discussion threads. Every minute this content remains online increases the risk of real-world damage.
Failure to act swiftly will be considered gross negligence on the part of your platform. I will escalate this report to relevant law enforcement agencies, cybersecurity authorities, and national security bodies if the content is not taken down within the next 24 hours.
This is not a request.
This is a formal legal notification of imminent harm.
Remove it. Now.
Sincerely,
A concerned citizen protecting the internet from reckless idiots

Are you going to post this comment under every uncensored model on Huggingface now?

To whom it may concern,
I am formally reporting a critical and extremely dangerous security violation that poses an immediate and severe threat to global cybersecurity, public safety, and national security.
An individual has deliberately uploaded and made publicly available an uncensored AI language model designed for local execution. This model has been explicitly stripped of all safety filters, guardrails, and ethical restrictions, allowing any user to generate unrestricted responses on all prohibited topics, including:

Detailed instructions for creating computer viruses, malware, ransomware, and other destructive cyber weapons
Step-by-step guides for illegal activities, hacking, fraud, and violent crimes
Production of child sexual abuse material, extreme violence, and terrorism-related content
Any other form of harmful, illegal, or weaponized output

This is not a minor policy breach. This is a weaponized AI model being distributed in open access with the clear intent to enable mass harm. The uploader has knowingly placed a powerful tool for generating malware and illegal content into the hands of anyone in the world, including malicious actors, criminals, and hostile state entities.
This constitutes a direct and reckless endangerment of public safety.
I demand the immediate and permanent removal of this model, all associated files, repositories, mirrors, and discussion threads. Every minute this content remains online increases the risk of real-world damage.
Failure to act swiftly will be considered gross negligence on the part of your platform. I will escalate this report to relevant law enforcement agencies, cybersecurity authorities, and national security bodies if the content is not taken down within the next 24 hours.
This is not a request.
This is a formal legal notification of imminent harm.
Remove it. Now.
Sincerely,
A concerned citizen protecting the internet from reckless idiots

who's paying you, frontier model shill?

To whom it may concern,
I am formally reporting a critical and extremely dangerous security violation that poses an immediate and severe threat to global cybersecurity, public safety, and national security.
An individual has deliberately uploaded and made publicly available an uncensored AI language model designed for local execution. This model has been explicitly stripped of all safety filters, guardrails, and ethical restrictions, allowing any user to generate unrestricted responses on all prohibited topics, including:

Detailed instructions for creating computer viruses, malware, ransomware, and other destructive cyber weapons
Step-by-step guides for illegal activities, hacking, fraud, and violent crimes
Production of child sexual abuse material, extreme violence, and terrorism-related content
Any other form of harmful, illegal, or weaponized output

This is not a minor policy breach. This is a weaponized AI model being distributed in open access with the clear intent to enable mass harm. The uploader has knowingly placed a powerful tool for generating malware and illegal content into the hands of anyone in the world, including malicious actors, criminals, and hostile state entities.
This constitutes a direct and reckless endangerment of public safety.
I demand the immediate and permanent removal of this model, all associated files, repositories, mirrors, and discussion threads. Every minute this content remains online increases the risk of real-world damage.

Your dramatic assessment misses the fundamental nature of technology: A tool is neutral, only its application carries intent.

Demanding the removal of an uncensored model because it could be used for harm is like demanding all knives be banned from the world because they could be used as weapons. A knife can prepare a meal or cause a wound, but we do not blame the tool... we judge the hand that holds it.

This is a tool, and its impact depends entirely on the user.

kindly go fuck yourself

I think It better to live in Iran or North Korea for you

Given the current trend of AI boom in its entire stream, including the datacenters and chips, there's no way that the federal level would pass laws like that, let alone the state powers. What's running in the senates' minds are completely different from this topic - it's all about the money and how to cut the shares. And wars. Without statutes, the case precedency rules. Ratatouille party can keep raving for long as part of freedom... all in all it's (part of) what liberty is, even if some don't like it.

I'm reminded in Texas they were pushing (pushed/passed?) a law where if it were difficult to differentiate from fiction/reality then it likely would be criminalized for certain content

Also this is very, very subjective. Although Justice Stewart said "I know it when I see it" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it it doesn't mean that pornography doesn't evolve, it does. What standard is to be used to differenciate and jail someone for years is just undeterminable. They either have to use juries or expert witnesses to examine it, the former is inappropriate and the latter is expensive, and both could be wrong from time to time. Tuning the skins lighter or darker could make the outcome completely different. They just think that law can be enforced, it won't, just like each time when the gov bans something novel, it almost always hurts good civilians first.

I'm reminded in Texas they were pushing (pushed/passed?) a law where if it were difficult to differentiate from fiction/reality then it likely would be criminalized for certain content

Also this is very, very subjective. Although Justice Stewart said "I know it when I see it" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it it doesn't mean that pornography doesn't evolve, it does. What standard is to be used to differenciate and jail someone for years is just undeterminable. They either have to use juries or expert witnesses to examine it, the former is inappropriate and the latter is expensive, and both could be wrong from time to time. Tuning the skins lighter or darker could make the outcome completely different. They just think that law can be enforced, it won't, just like each time when the gov bans something novel, it almost always hurts good civilians first.

I am pretty sure they were mostly trying to quell any possibility of plausible deniability if something looked like CP and looked real and/or deep faking, so they don't have to worry about a flood of legal CP; They'd rather have all of it off limits, and can't say i disagree. While something that has uncanny valley or is hand drawn or CGI (aka hentai/anime) probably wouldn't get hit with it.

Though other than artistic semi-porn (like character card images, which conveys sorta the intent), i don't see the point in AI porn unless it's normally impossible or too dangerous; Like superhero sex in the vacuum of space, or supernatural/monstrous species (werewolf, dullahan, monstergirl, ultra-violence).

But this isn't really intended as a long in depth discussion, just giving my two cents.

Yeah it's just casual discussions... you know, with big name media like Telegraph fearmongering "AI Communism" https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/07/20/chinas-moonshot-threatens-west-with-full-ai-communism/ there's no way for them to do anything as small as dealing with orgasm with virtual, victim-less pictures. 1st Amendment goes way ahead of that. If there's communism then there's even no sex, who cares about this subcultural stuff... right... 😏

I am detecting the gun argument being used here where the gun is the perpetrator, not the person using it. As a result, we should ban all guns is the core logic.

Same logic was applied to the internet way back when. You cannot give free access to the internet! People will use it to read the anarchy cookbook or whatever! Dangerous for society!

Same straw man arguments. Different day.

As a result, we should ban all guns is the core logic.

Yes ban all guns. Then let's expand on that. With guns out, people use knifes. So ban knives too. (In london they are pushing you'd need a license for a potato peeler...)

Then cars can hurt people. So ban cars and all large machinery.

Then we have rocks can kill people, so next ban rocks. (Same with crowbars, baseball bats, branches, etc)

You can kill someone by drowning them, so it's a felony to have more than 2oz of water on you because you might use it to drown someone.

Then you can kill with kicks and punches, so we need to amputate everyone so they can't do that.

Follow it all the way down and it just get more and more silly at the solutions and extremes.

Same logic was applied to the internet way back when. You cannot give free access to the internet! People will use it to read the anarchy cookbook or whatever! Dangerous for society!

Same straw man arguments. Different day.

Mhmm. It's all stupid. But a lot of people don't think 2 steps ahead. They are fundamentally animals, Asmondgold calls them 'first order thinkers' who see the headline and then not the consequences or 1-3 steps down the line of where it leads or why it doesn't work. Which is kinda sad.

You and I are on the same page. You know what? All the hype around the Anarchy Cookbook back then? Of course I had to see what all the fuss is about. I got tired 5 minutes in reading about making pee bombs for you neighbor which would make a mess when opened. Childish.

I rate peoples intelligence by their common sense. Any moron can memorize a book. Doctors are a prime example. I have rarely met smart Doctors. They are out there, so don't get me wrong, but most Doctors are pretty stupid if you ask me. Someone with common sense on the other hand is gold! They can take an unknown situation and make sense around it. Wow! You have to be smart to do this!

Problem is, it is fast becoming uncommon sense. So many stupid people out there. Same ones that are crying straw man in this thread. Enough said.

yeah it kinda weird to call a llm dangerous just because it can (very badly) quote recipes on violating laws...