codewithdark commited on
Commit
2c1abb9
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): aabc856

Add files using upload-large-folder tool

Browse files
raw/proxies/0000893538/0001047469-04-012163/proxy.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
raw/proxies/0000893538/0001047469-04-012163/proxy_rpt.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
2
+ Set forth below is a description of transactions entered into between St. Mary and certain of its officers and directors during the last fiscal year. Some of
3
+ these transactions will continue in effect and may result in conflicts of interest between St. Mary and these individuals. Although these persons owe fiduciary duties to St. Mary and its stockholders,
4
+ we cannot assure you that conflicts of interest will always be resolved in favor of St. Mary.
5
+ As
6
+ a result of their prior employment with another company with which St. Mary engaged in a number of transactions, Ronald D. Boone, a director of St. Mary, and two vice presidents of
7
+ St. Mary own royalty interests in certain of St. Mary's properties, which were earned as part of the prior employer's employee benefit programs. One vice president also owns certain working interests
8
+ through participation in acquisitions made by his former employer. Those persons have no royalty participation or working interest in any new St. Mary properties.
9
+ 18
10
+ Mr. Boone
11
+ also owns 25% of Princeton Energy LLC, which owns the oil and gas working interests that he acquired as a result of his prior employment. Although Mr. Boone does
12
+ not manage this entity, he may participate in any investment decisions made by them.
13
+ St.
14
+ Mary's by-laws provide that no director, officer or employee may pursue for his or her own account a business or investment opportunity if he or she has obtained
15
+ knowledge of such opportunity through his or her affiliation with the Company. In addition, no officer or employee of St. Mary may pursue for his or her own account an oil and gas opportunity as to
16
+ which his or her knowledge of the opportunity was not obtained through his or her affiliation with the Company unless (a) with respect to an officer of St. Mary, the officer's pursuit of the
17
+ opportunity has been approved by the Board of Directors and (b) with respect to a non-officer of St. Mary, the employee's pursuit of the opportunity has been approved by a senior
18
+ officer of St. Mary with full knowledge of such opportunity. These restrictions do not apply to the acquisition of less than one percent of the publicly traded stock of another company.
raw/proxies/0000893538/0001047469-06-004592/proxy.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
raw/proxies/0000893538/0001047469-11-003510/proxy.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
raw/proxies/0000893538/0001047469-11-003510/proxy_rpt.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
2
+ Policies and Procedures on Transactions with Related Persons
3
+ We have adopted a Policy and Procedures With Respect to Related Person Transactions (the "Related Person Policy"), which sets forth the
4
+ policies and procedures for the Audit Committee's review of any transaction, arrangement, or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or series of similar transactions,
5
+ arrangements, or relationships in which (1) we are a participant, (2) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000, and (3) a related person has or
6
+ will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of the Related Person Policy, a "related person" means (1) any of our directors, executive officers, or nominees for director,
7
+ (2) any stockholder that beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, and (3) any immediate family member of any of the foregoing. The Audit
8
+ Committee approves or ratifies only those transactions that it determines in good faith are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of our company and its stockholders.
9
+ In
10
+ determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction with a related person, the Audit Committee takes into account the factors it deems appropriate, which may include, among others,
11
+ the benefits to us, the availability of other sources for comparable products or services, the impact on a director's independence in the event the related person is a director, and the extent of the
12
+ related person's interest in the transaction. The policy also provides for the delegation of Audit Committee authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee for any related person transaction
13
+ requiring pre-approval or ratification between meetings of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses ongoing relationships with a related person on at least an annual
14
+ basis to see that they are in compliance with the policy and remain appropriate.
15
+ In
16
+ addition, our By-Laws provide that a director, officer, or employee of our company may not pursue for his or her own account a business or investment opportunity that he
17
+ or she learned about through his or her affiliation with our company. Our By-Laws also provide that our officers or employees may not pursue for his or her own account an oil and gas
18
+ opportunity that he or she independently learned about unless (1) with respect to an officer of our company, the officer's pursuit of the opportunity has been approved by the Board, and
19
+ (2) with respect to a non-officer of our company, the employee's pursuit of the opportunity has been approved by a senior officer of our company with full knowledge of that
20
+ opportunity. These restrictions do not apply to the acquisition of less than 1% of the publicly traded stock of another company.
21
+ Related Person Transactions
22
+ We recognize that transactions with related persons may raise questions among stockholders as to whether those transactions are
23
+ consistent with our best interests and the interests of our stockholders. It is our policy to enter into or ratify such transactions only when the Board, acting through the Audit Committee or as
24
+ otherwise described herein, determines that the transaction in question is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of our company and its stockholders, including but not limited to
25
+ situations where we may obtain products or services of a nature, quantity or quality, or on other terms, that are not readily available from alternative sources or when we provide products or services
26
+ to related persons on an arm's length basis on terms comparable to those provided to unrelated third parties or on terms comparable to those provided to employees generally. Set forth below is a
27
+ description of all transactions between our company and related persons since the beginning of January 1, 2010.
28
+ 11
29
+ Table of Contents
30
+ Mr. Quintana
31
+ is the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of TESCO Corporation, which designs, manufactures, and delivers technology based solutions for the upstream
32
+ energy industry, including oilfield drilling technology, services, and equipment. We have an agreement with TESCO for the provision of services to us in connection with our drilling and completion
33
+ operations. This agreement continues until canceled by either us or TESCO on 30 days advance written notice. Pursuant to this agreement, we are obligated to pay TESCO only for services actually
34
+ performed. This agreement does not require us to make any other payments to TESCO. Prior to 2010, the services provided by TESCO and the amounts we paid did not exceed the threshold amount for review
35
+ under our Related Person Policy. In May 2010, as part of its annual review of related party transactions, the Audit Committee reviewed the relationship between TESCO and our company and determined at
36
+ such time that we had not paid any amounts to TESCO during 2010. During August 2010 through December 2010, TESCO provided services to us in our ArkLaTex region. In December 2010, the Audit Committee
37
+ again reviewed the relationship between our company and TESCO, but the final 2010 amounts paid to or incurred to be paid to TESCO were not then available for review. Upon the later calculation of the
38
+ final 2010 amounts paid to TESCO, we determined that we had paid TESCO $346,683 for services rendered after August 2010. In addition, as of March 31, 2011, we had paid TESCO $291,635 for
39
+ services in 2011. Based upon these amounts, the Audit Committee reviewed the relationship between our company and TESCO and determined that the relationship is in the best interests of our company and
40
+ its stockholders.
41
+ 12
42
+ Table of Contents
raw/proxies/0000893538/0001047469-13-004253/proxy.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
raw/proxies/0000893538/0001047469-13-004253/proxy_rpt.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
2
+ Policies and Procedures on Transactions with Related Persons
3
+ We have adopted a Policy and Procedures with Respect to Related Person Transactions (the "Related Person Transactions Policy"), which
4
+ sets forth the policies and procedures for the Audit Committee's review of any transaction, arrangement, or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or series of similar
5
+ transactions, arrangements, or relationships in which (a) we are a participant, (b) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 per annum, and (c) a
6
+ related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of our Related Person Transactions Policy, a "related person" means (i) any of our directors, executive
7
+ officers, or nominees for director, (ii) any stockholder that beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, and (iii) any immediate family member of any of
8
+ the foregoing. The Audit Committee approves or ratifies only those transactions that it determines in good faith are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests and the best interests of our
9
+ stockholders.
10
+ In
11
+ determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction with a related person, the Audit Committee takes into account the factors it deems appropriate, which may include, among others,
12
+ the benefits to us, the availability of other sources for comparable products or services, the impact on a director's independence in the event the related person is a director, and the extent of the
13
+ related person's interest in the transaction. The policy also provides for the delegation of Audit Committee authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee for any related person transaction requiring
14
+ pre-approval or ratification between meetings of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses ongoing relationships with a related person on at least an annual basis to
15
+ ensure that they are in compliance with the policy and remain appropriate.
16
+ In
17
+ addition, our By-Laws provide that a director, officer, or employee of our company may not pursue for his or her own account a business or investment opportunity that he
18
+ or she learned about
19
+ 11
20
+ Table of Contents
21
+ through
22
+ his or her affiliation with us. These restrictions do not apply to the acquisition of less than 1% of the publicly traded stock of another company.
23
+ Related Person Transactions
24
+ We recognize that transactions with related persons may raise questions among stockholders regarding whether those transactions are
25
+ consistent with our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. It is our policy to enter into or ratify such transactions only when the Board, acting through the Audit Committee or as
26
+ otherwise described herein, determines that the transaction in question is in, or is not inconsistent with, our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. Such transactions include,
27
+ but are not limited to, situations where we may obtain products or services of a nature, quantity or quality, or on other terms, that are not readily available from alternate sources, or when we
28
+ obtain products or services from, or provide products or services to, related persons on an arm's length basis on terms comparable to those obtained from or provided to unrelated third parties or on
29
+ terms comparable to those obtained from or provided to employees generally. The only transaction between our company and a related person since January 1, 2012, is our relationship with Tesco,
30
+ which was referenced above. Mr. Quintana is the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Tesco, which designs, manufactures, and delivers technology based solutions for the
31
+ upstream energy industry, including oilfield drilling and completion technology, services, and equipment. We have an agreement with Tesco for its provision of equipment and services to us in
32
+ connection with our drilling and completion operations. This agreement continues until canceled by either us or Tesco on 30 days advance written notice. Pursuant to this agreement, we are
33
+ obligated to pay Tesco only for services actually performed or equipment provided, as the case may be, as requested by us from time to time. This agreement does not require us to make any other
34
+ payments to Tesco, nor does it obligate us to use Tesco for any services or equipment. Mr. Quintana does not have any direct or indirect interest in the transaction, other than as a result of
35
+ serving as an executive officer and director of Tesco. Mr. Quintana had no input in our selection of Tesco for equipment and services or the terms of our agreement with Tesco. Decisions to use
36
+ Tesco are made by technical professionals supervising the relevant regional activity, based on their assessment of Tesco's equipment and services and related costs in comparison to other providers. In
37
+ 2012, we paid Tesco $600,265. The amount we paid Tesco during 2012 for equipment and services represented approximately 6% of the total amount paid by us to all service providers (including Tesco) for
38
+ similar equipment and services during 2012. As of March 31, 2013, we had paid Tesco $350,517 for equipment and services rendered during 2013. In accordance with our Related Person Transactions
39
+ Policy, the Audit Committee reviewed the relationship between us and Tesco and determined that the relationship is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders.
40
+ 12
41
+ Table of Contents